BLN
HOME
|
September 2004
|
Welcome to the September 2004
edition of Business Leasing News.
From: David G. Mayer, a business transactions partner
of the law firm of Patton Boggs LLP and author of the book, Business Leasing for Dummies ® (BLFD). The book is
out of print, but a few copies are still available; so if you want
to find a copy, please search the web today! Thanks for buying my
book for three years.
This
e-newsletter offers timely, concise information and analysis backed
by supporting research. Please contact Business
Leasing News (BLN) to provide us with your
feedback. Thanks for taking your valuable time to read BLN-which
does more than just report the news. |
**************************************************************
|
In this
issue: |
A Message From the Founder, David G.
Mayer |
**************************************************************
|
1.
Tech Spending Improves Despite Doubts; Leasing Supports Its
Growth
Despite optimism earlier this year for growth in the
technology sector, some CEOs have become more concerned about the
economy for the balance of 2004. They seem to be holding back on
capital spending, though they haven't cut their budgets. Stock
prices of technology companies have been taking a beating, with a
reprieve in the last week or so, as a result of this pause in
spending on information technology (IT) assets. See: Tech Shares
Approach Bear-Market Status, The Wall Street Journal
(S.W. Ed.), Page C:1, Col. 2 (Aug. 16, 2004). Taking a far more
optimistic view, chief information officers (CIOs) may yet loosen
the purse strings and push back against the reluctance of their
CEOs. In doing so, they may increase IT acquisitions by using
leasing, which provides a flexibility and value to fuel their IT
spending, and supports their capital expenditure budgets.
Industry Optimism
Still Evident
In June, Forrester Research, projected a 6 percent growth
in IT spending, significantly higher than the one-to-two percent
projected about a year ago. Even more encouraging, Forrester then
expected software spending to jump 9 percent in 2004 and computer
and communications spending to grow 16 percent and 13 percent,
respectively. While hardware prices in June 2004 remained steady,
software prices stayed weak. In short, IT spending seemed to be
gathering a head of steam in the first half of 2004 as business
conditions started to improve, but not all IT assets enjoyed the
same interest. See: A Recovering Tech Market, by Demir Barlas,
Line 56 (on-line) Aug. 30, 2004.
In August, the Computer Technology
Industry Association (CompTIA) issued a study that suggested
confidence in an improving business environment over the next
12-to-18 months. Based on a survey of IT resellers, value-added
resellers, service providers and system integrators in North
America, nearly 90 percent of the participants expected revenue
growth of 10 percent or more for their companies while only 9
percent of the participants expected a decline in revenues. See:
IT Industry Optimism about Business Conditions, by Sandy
Kendall, Metrics Section, CIO Magazine (online), Aug. 19,
2004.
*Opportunity Point: According to
CompTIA, revenue growth will come from increased sales rather than
mergers and financial engineering. Consequently, opportunities to
finance and lease equipment should expand to reflect that growth,
but may be tempered by reluctance of CEOs to outpace the improved
results of their companies. CompTIA suggests that the greatest area
of spending includes systems integration and application
implementation, network security and storage solutions. Look for
highly distributed network environments to lead the way to strong
growth over the next 24 months, with a significant soft cost
component on services as a way for the IT sellers and resellers to
gain margin. Enterprise software or "strategic" software should rise
9 percent according to Forrester. Tech spending expected to grow, but also change in
2004, Detroit News Technology. However, federal
government IT spending may dip about 4 percent. See: Federal
Spending Dips, by Demir Barlas, Line 56 (on-line), July 23, 2004.
The August CIO Tech
Polltm
confirms the potential for these opportunities. In its press
release, it said:
In August's
CIO Magazine Tech Polltm, the outlook for
IT budgets is the strongest in three years. CIO's predict an
average of 9% spending growth over the coming 12 months with the
most growth occurring in security software and storage. In
addition, 62% of respondents report they are experiencing
"significant" application backlogs. The biggest surprise in this
month's survey is the sharp increase in infrastructure software.
Forty-two percent (41.8%) of respondents indicate plans to
increase infrastructure software spending compared to 28.6% at
this time last year, a sign of a possible increase in software
spending.
The bottom line,
however, suggests that growth will continue unabated even though
technology companies continue to suffer from a bearish sentiment on
Wall Street. See: Shakeout Hits Tech Sector Amid a Tepid
Recovery, The Wall Street Journal, (S.W. Ed.), Page A:1,
3, Col. 1, 3, Aug. 13, 2004. CEOs, CFOs and CIOs have different
views of appropriate spending levels. CIO Magazine quoted a
noted economist indicating the positive direction of the market:
"Despite the
disappointing performance of technology stocks recently, our poll
shows a gradual but consistent improvement in IT budget trends."
says Dr. Ed Yardeni, Chief Investment Strategist for Prudential
Equity Group, LLC.
Forrest Research
found recently, due to increasing CIO confidence in the economy,
that 39 percent of companies it polled expect spending to surpass
their budgets, and 66 percent will raise budgets in 2005. CIO Confidence Poll: Q3 2004 IT Optimism Jumps Again
In The Third Quarter, Forrester Research, by Tom Pohlmann with Natalie Lambert, Aug, 24, 2004
(subscription required).
Companies have
developed significant goals for their IT systems. The systems must
provide reliable and simple performance, cost efficiency, improved
productivity, and competitive and strategic advantages. These goals
tend to demand ever increasing flexibility and updated hardware and
software resources. These requirements do not necessarily indicate
that companies can or will write large checks to buy these
tools.
Leasing Value in
Expanding Market
Leasing provides
significant benefits to acquire capital assets without such large
capital outlays. Technology illustrates some unique value of
leasing. See: Options
to Lease, by Dan Flagstad, Risk Management Magazine
(online).
Consider the
following four reasons for leasing IT assets. Leasing can:
-
Decrease
cash commitments. Lessors who purchase IT assets generally
understand the potential value and residual value, or lack of such
value, in a given transaction. Using that knowledge, their
appetite for tax benefits and their cost of funds, they can
provide competitive rates to finance or lease these assets without
the users making large capital outlays.
-
Keep
Pace with Change. Though many companies have invested in
legacy systems where moving data to new systems remains
problematic, technology improvements continue to advance
relentlessly toward better and faster systems. According to Moore's Law, processing power will double every
18 months. Most IT leases, which extend 3 to 4 years, allow for
some upgrades to keep pace with these changes without large
additional cash expenditures by users.
-
Provide
Diverse Capital Sources. Companies can meet their IT spending
requirements with investments from manufacturers, which have
direct financing or leasing programs, or their captive finance
companies, which provide leasing and financing apart from the
sales operations. Captives dedicate their functions to
facilitating sales, advancing strategic placements of their
manufacturing products, and providing a one-stop shopping solution
for customers to buy and finance equipment and software. Banks,
independent leasing companies and other finance companies compete
for business in this realm. In short, users have an array of
choices to finance and lease IT investments.
-
Improve
IT Portfolio Management. Leasing provides IT managers a better
way to manage their portfolios of assets and functions. They can
often achieve reduced costs, increased services, and enhanced
performance due to available upgrades and flexible lease terms.
One of the most flexible tools that has emerged in the last few
years is utility computing, explained below in Leasing 101. This method of acquiring IT assets
enables a company to pay only for its actual uses of IT assets
according to appropriate metrics.
Even though Wall Street
has focused on the bearish tendencies of stock prices of IT
companies, IT spending has strengthened and shows promise over the
next two years. Companies will acquire billions of dollars of new
equipment and software to improve efficiency, security and
competitive positions in their markets. According to the Equipment Leasing
Association, leasing will provide an estimated $28 billion of
IT leases by 2005. If CIOs have their way, IT spending will
continue to expand, and leasing will play a significant role in
this positive trend despite lingering doubts of senior management
and Wall Street.
[Top]
2. California Imposes New Use
Taxes on Aircraft, Vehicles and Vessels
California's Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, the
"Terminator", signed a bill on August 16, 2004 to end a sales
tax benefit for aircraft, vehicles and vessels for almost two years.
As part of California's revenue-raising provisions
in the tax law, SB1100 amends Section 6248 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code to impose use tax on aircraft, vehicles and vessels.
The law does so by shifting a presumption as to when purchasers pay
use tax. The net effect is to raise taxes in California on the backs
of lessors and other owners of these assets.
Under the old rule, if a purchaser acquired an
aircraft, vehicle or vessel outside of California and did not
transport or bring it into California within the first 90 days after
purchase, California presumed that the owner would not store, use or
otherwise consume the property in California. Accordingly,
California would not subject the property to use tax. To raise
revenue, the 90-day presumption will now become twelve-months. As
stated in the Legislative Digest to SB1100:
This bill would, until July 1, 2006, expand this
presumption to a vehicle, vessel, or aircraft, if that vehicle,
vessel, or aircraft is (1) purchased by a California resident, (2)
subject to California's registration or property tax laws during
the first 12 months of ownership, or (3) used or stored in this
state more than 1/2 of the time during the first 12 months of
ownership. See: Section 2 of SB 1100.
*Technical
Point: The presumption that a purchaser acquires an
aircraft, vehicle or vessel for storage, use or consumption in
California may be disproved by documents such as registration of
that vehicle, vessel or aircraft with the proper authority outside
of California.
Understanding the implication of the rule, in the
past, aircraft owners, for example, stored their aircraft outside
California for the first 90 days to avoid paying the use tax.
Thereafter, the owners could hangar the aircraft in California
without paying the use tax.
*Action Item:
This new rule takes effect after October 1, 2004. See:
Section 6248(f). Consequently, if you intend to purchase an aircraft
as the owner-operator or owner-lessor, you should enter into a
binding contract or purchase the aircraft on or before October 1,
2004 to avoid the new, longer presumption period of twelve months.
Play it safe; don't wait until October 1, 2004!
The new law will preserve exemptions from use tax
when the purchaser uses the aircraft in interstate or foreign
commerce for more than 50 percent of the period during the first 180
days after purchase of the aircraft. Further, the law will not apply
to the repair, retrofit or modification of the aircraft or vessel
and for up to 25 hours thereafter to leave California if the owner's
purpose is to deliver or return the property outside of California.
See: Section 6248(e)(2).
*Warning: While
the rules described here may seem straightforward, the tax laws
affecting aircraft, vehicles and vessels are not, and the rules here
have been generalized in some respects. You should seek advice of a
qualified professional to assist you. Be aware that California is
aggressively seeking revenue in general. As a result, property,
sales and use tax collection efforts may change the cost of storing,
using or consuming vehicles, vessels and aircraft in California. As
a lessor, you should carefully monitor sales, use and property taxes
of your lessees to avoid the imposition of a lien on your property
by any government entity in California. A tax lien may diminish the
value of your investment or cause a lease default.
California has little choice but to raise revenue
to balance its budget. Owners of vehicles, vessels and aircraft will
do their part by paying more use taxes, at least through the end of
June 2006.
[Top]
3. Mediation Provides A Different Way to
Address Defaults
When your lessee or secured borrower defaults midway through
the lease/loan term, your first reaction may be to call in
litigators and start preparing for a lawsuit on the obligation. This
response may be especially true if a payment default occurs rather
than merely a breach of covenant or other requirement under the
lease or loan. Naturally, you expect that the sooner you foreclose
and show the lessee or borrower you're serious, the more likely it
is that you'll recover your investment in the deal.
But there may be a more effective way to address the problem.
Bringing in a neutral third party to mediate a dispute over
non-payment (or other default) may in certain cases prove to be more
manageable, less time consuming, and ultimately much more
financially beneficial to all parties.
A Time to Talk and a Time to Sue
Not every default situation is a good candidate for third
party intervention. For example, sometimes the lessee, for whatever
reason, decides it's in its best interest just to stop paying rent.
Sometimes the lessee refuses to talk with you or even to respond to
your demands for payment. In these kinds of cases you may have
little choice but to "lower the boom" and take serious legal
action.
There are other situations, though, in which serious thought
should be given to engaging a professional third party to step in
and help resolve the dispute before it gets out of hand. Perhaps the
lessee is experiencing other business or financial pressures,
unbeknownst to you, that are affecting its ability to pay. Perhaps
the lessee is part of a larger group of affiliated companies and is
being directed to take actions that even its own management doesn't
approve. Perhaps the non-payment is triggered by one-time events
that will soon be resolved, and the default cured.
A skilled, knowledgeable, and neutral mediator, meeting
privately with all parties and drawing out such information, may
often help the parties themselves craft a workable and
cost-effective resolution of the issues at hand. Someone who is "at
the table" with no agenda other than to work through the problems
and help structure a mutually acceptable resolution may be the key
to keeping you out of long, costly, and risky litigation.
Getting Beyond the Obvious
The most important benefit of third party mediation in
financial disputes is the ability of the neutral mediator to meet
privately and confidentially with each party to dig out what's
really going on with the deal. Often the lessee's default, even if
it's simply a failure to pay rent, may involve more than meets the
eye. An experienced mediator who specializes in these kinds of
disputes can ask the right questions and dig out the underlying
agendas and issues. This is usually done in confidential "caucuses,"
allowing the parties to retain control of their own information
while providing the mediator with the background essential to
working out a solution that everyone can accept.
Armed with this confidential information, the mediator can
form a view of the entire transaction - and of the dispute. This
process analysis allows a full exploration with all parties of
various options and alternative ways of resolving the issues, not
just solutions that may be obvious at the outset. Using an iterative
process of working through both the common and the private problems,
an experienced mediator can often guide the parties to a settlement
that would not have been possible without third party
intervention.
How to Select a Mediator
To make this process work, it is essential to find a neutral
mediator who understands the fundamental issues that arise in
leasing or lending deals, who is experienced in mediating financial
disputes, and who is knowledgeable in leasing and financing
terminology and concepts. Using such a person will save everyone
involved a great deal of time and frustration in having to educate
the mediator before getting to the real issues.
There are providers of ADR (alternative dispute resolution)
services in major cities throughout the U.S., in Europe, and
elsewhere in the world. Many of the larger ADR providers include on
their panels of neutral specialists in a variety of subject matter
areas, often including business disputes and corporate finance. In
addition, there are smaller mediation and consulting firms who
provide experienced, neutral mediators specializing in very specific
kinds of disputes - secured financing, leasing, business
dissolutions, and various kinds of corporate financing
transactions.
Although many professional mediators are also lawyers, it is
not essential that you use a lawyer in this role. There are
qualified and experienced non-lawyer mediators who can bring the
benefit of their business experience and expertise to bear on even
very difficult and complex financial disputes. A lawyer mediator may
be able to help you (and your attorney) sort out some of the
underlying legal issues. However, the most important attributes of a
successful mediator include a strong knowledge of how leasing or
equipment lending works and the ability to ferret out how the
parties' underlying agendas affect their positions at the
negotiating table.
*Tip: Before engaging any
third party mediator, you should:
-
Ask for a complete resume and references
that can be contacted regarding the mediator's prior experience
and working methods.
-
Look not only for direct experience and
knowledge in leasing, lending and corporate finance but also for
indications of how well you think you will be able to work with
the mediator.
-
Require any prospective mediator describe
how he or she intends to conduct the mediation. Every mediator
approaches the task in a unique way, and not every approach may be
successful in your situation. For example, ask (1) how the issues
will be drawn out and analyzed, (2) how the parties will be
expected to participate, and (3) what additional information
(lease documents, spreadsheets, pricing runs, even statements from
outside experts) will be requested or required during the
mediation.
*Remember: In mediation
(unlike arbitration or a court trial) the parties control the
process. The mediator is there to serve you and all parties in
helping to work out a mutually acceptable resolution of a dispute.
Acting early in a problem may avoid bankruptcy or other adverse
consequences that will cost you more and potentially produce far
less return on your investment.
I would like to thank Paul
Bent of the Alta Group for contributing this article. Paul is a
lawyer and mediator with lengthy experience in leasing and finance.
He works as a member of The Alta Group litigation support team.
[Top]
4. BLN Case & Comment:
BankVest Assumes Lease, Ignoring Non-monetary
Defaults
A lessor's creditors put the lessor into an involuntary
bankruptcy. During that case, the lessor wanted to collect $1
million of unpaid rent from its lessees. See: In re Bankvest Capital Corp., 360 F.3d 291, No.
03-9006, (First Cir., March 15, 2004).
Although BankVest committed some non-monetary defaults
against these lessees, this case shows that such defaults don't have
to be cured (in certain jurisdictions) by a debtor-in-possession
under the federal Bankruptcy Code (the lessor, BankVest, in this
case), to assume leases and sue for certain back rents.
FACTS: BankVest Capital Corporation (BankVest) entered
into separate lease agreements with Eagle Insurance Company and
Newark Insurance Company (Lessees) covering 190 items of computer
equipment. Due to production delays, the manufacturer, Nortel, could
not deliver 20 of the 190 items until several months after the start
of the lease term. To cover the gap period, BankVest provided the
Lessees with "loaner" equipment.
On December 17, 1999, before BankVest could replace the
loaner equipment, BankVest's creditors filed an involuntary Chapter
11 petition against BankVest. BankVest proposed a plan of
reorganization in bankruptcy that the bankruptcy court confirmed the
plan on May 31, 2001. During the bankruptcy proceedings, the Lessees
continued to use the leased property and loaner equipment,
accumulating unpaid rent of approximately $1 million.
As the debtor-in-possession, BankVest wanted to assume the
leases without first curing non-monetary defaults (the non-delivery
of the 20 items of equipment). The Bankruptcy Court allowed the
assumption. See: In re BankVest Capital Corp., 270 B.R. 541, 543
(Bankr. D. Mass. 2001). BankVest was not in default on any monetary
provision -- given that BankVest was the lessor to which the Lessees
made payments under the leases (as lessor, it made no payments). The
court held that there were no cure claims that had to be satisfied
before the assumption of the leases by BankVest. See page 544
(affirmed In re BankVest Capital Corp., 290 B.R. 443, 447-48 (B.A.P.
1st Cir. 2003). The Lessees timely appealed because they argued that
all non-monetary defaults had to be cured before BankVest could
assume the leases under 11 U.S.C. §365(b)(2)(D).
ISSUE: Does 11 U.S.C. §365(b)(2)(D) permit a
debtor-in-possession to assume an unexpired lease without first
curing non-monetary default?
LAW: Section 365(b)(1) of the federal Bankruptcy Code
provides that if the debtor has defaulted on a contract prior to
assumption, the debtor, cannot assume that contract unless it (1)
cures the default; (2) compensates the non-debtor party for any
actual pecuniary losses resulting from the default; and (3) provides
adequate assurance of future performance under the contract.
(BankVest's failure to replace the loaner equipment constituted such
a default.). A relevant exception to this rule arises under Section
365(b)(2)(D)(2). That section states that no cure by the debtor is
required for a breach of a provision relating to "(D) the
satisfaction of any penalty rate or provision relating to a default
arising from any failure by the debtor to perform non-monetary
obligations under the executory contract or unexpired lease."
In re Claremont Acquisition Corp., 113 F.3d 1029,
1034-35 (9th Cir. 1997), the Ninth Circuit held that non-monetary
defaults must be cured before assumption.
OUTCOME: The answer to the issue presented is "yes."
The BankVest Court disagreed with and criticized Claremont.
The Court, noting the overriding purpose to rehabilitate the
debtors, would not allow the Lessees to use a "historical fact" (the
non-delivery of 20 items of computers equipment) to block the
assumption of the leases. The Bankruptcy Court ruled that BankVest
did not have to cure the default of failing to deliver the 20 items
of equipment, which constituted a "quintessential example of a
nonmonetary default" within the meaning of subparagraph (2)(D). See:
270 B.R. at 544. The decision cleared the way for BankVest to assume
the leases and to file an action to collect the $1 million in
outstanding rent. In that action, the Lessees could raise their
defenses to payment and counterclaim for damages for any losses
actually suffered through BankVest's alleged breach.
*Comment: On June 21, 2004,
the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in the BankVest case. It refused
to decide the same issue on which the Claremont court in the Ninth
Circuit and the BankVest court in the First Circuit reached opposite
outcomes. Congress will have to fix the law to avoid further
expensive and arguably unnecessary litigation.
In the meantime, as a lessor, you should heed the warning of
the case and take certain actions to protect your interests against
an adverse result of your lessee failing to cure non-monetary
defaults while piling up rent and other defaults that damage, if not
destroy, your lease investment. For example, you can:
-
Improve your internal ratings systems for
troubled leases so you take corrective actions sooner if your
lessee's credit deteriorates. Consider mediation, if necessary, as
discussed in BLN's article 3 above entitled Mediation Provides A Different Way to Address
Defaults.
-
Monitor non-monetary defaults closely and
don't assume that you cannot or should not exercise remedies
against a lessee, even where no monetary defaults exist. Early
action may save you from high bankruptcy court expenses and
investment losses. For example, regularly inspect leased property
for proper maintenance and confirm timely insurance
renewals.
-
Terminate your lease before your lessee
files a petition for bankruptcy to argue that the lessee has no
leasehold rights that it can assume, and seek the immediate return
of your leased property.
*Tip: As a lessee, you too
should be cognizant of the credit of your lessor, especially during
the time that your lessor has commitments to pay for, or deliver,
equipment to you. By doing so, you may avoid the fight that the
Lessees in BankVest faced at high court costs and disruptive use of
executive time.
[Top]
5. Leasing 101:
What is
"Utility Computing"?
Imagine that you don't own your computer and can pay for it
only as much as you actually use it. That idea is the essence of
utility computing. As defined by IBM Global Services, "Utility
computing is the on demand delivery of infrastructure, applications,
and business processes in a security-rich, shared, scaleable, and
standards-based environment over the Internet for a fee." See: The utility business model and the future of computing
services, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1, at
page 38 (2004).
While IBM's definition is packed with meaning and industry
jargon, IBM more simply explains that utility computing isn't much
different than the utilities business of providing water, power,
heat and common carrier transportation. You pay for what you use as
you use it. You don't own the bus you ride or the power plant that
generates your power. Likewise, the computer and network user
doesn't own the computer, network or its software, but pays only for
the use, by appropriate metrics.
A cellular telephone combines a contrasting model that you
can combine with the utility model--the "subscription" model. You
can pay a base fee and then pay for minutes you use over your set
allocation of minutes in each billing period.
Although utility computing isn't intended to be a lease per
se, the arrangement seems to fit the concept of an Article 2A
"lease" to the extent the utility computing model covers goods, such
as computer hardware (and software imbedded in the goods). A "lease" under Article 2A in part means a transfer of the
right to possession and use of goods for a term in return for consideration, but
a sale, including a sale on approval or a sale or return, or
retention or creation of a security interest is not a lease. In a utility computing arrangement, the
user receives a transfer of the right to use and possess the system,
but the user clearly does not intend to buy the system. Title always
stays with the provider/owner of the system. The user has a right to
possess the system and use it in return for paying fees or other
consideration.
*Tip: Utility computing
seems to fit the Article 2A definition of a lease. However, you
generally don't use lease terminology in utility computing
arrangements, but should consider adding precautionary language and
filings of financing statements under Section 9-505 of the Uniform Commercial Code in
the event a court treats the arrangement as a lease. Some leases
combine lease structures with utility computing prices. This
approach results in a true lease for state and tax law purposes, but
with variable rents under the utility computing pricing model.
Utility computing is an evolving method to put technology in
the market for large and small companies. IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems, Inc. and other vendors offer
different utility computing options. See: IDC: SMB Next Big Utility Computing Market,
NetworkWorldFusion (Jan. 9, 2004).
BLN's Leasing 101 definition offers a start to understanding
this growing method of acquiring, deploying and using of technology
equipment and software, together with services, and pay for it as
you go. See: Pay as You Go, InformationWeek (March
4, 2002).
[Top]
6. BLN Briefs: Biz Roundtable Ups
CAPEX: Mexican Trucks in U.S.; CA Waste Law
Update
Business Roundtable Plans Capital Expenditures.
The September Economic Outlook Survey of the Business Roundtable indicates that 49 percent of
the companies expect to increase capital spending in the next six
months. Only 7 percent expected decreases while 45 percent expected
no change. The 118 CEOs who responded represent $4 trillion of
annual revenue and 10 million employees. Their sense that "America's
...economy is fundamentally healthy..." should bode well for
equipment finance and leasing.
Mexican Trucks Roll on U.S. Roads. In Department of Transportation et al. v. Public Citizen
et al., No. 03-358 (argued April 21, 2004 and decided June 7,
2004), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Mexican trucks can use U.S.
highways without completion of environmental studies. It is unclear
whether the ruling will prove to be a detriment or provide
opportunity for lessors and lenders on rolling stock, especially in
the southwestern part of the United States.
*Technical
Point: This case rules, more specifically, that the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) did not violate
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) or the relevant
regulations of the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) when it
did not consider the environmental effect of the increase in
cross-border operations of Mexican motor carriers in its limited
environmental assessment. Nor did FMCSA act improperly by not
performing, pursuant to The Clean Air Act (CAA) and relevant
regulations, a full conformity review analysis for its proposed
regulations.
ELA's Amendment to Waste Bill is Trashed.
The Equipment Leasing Association attempted to
reduce the adverse impact of California Senate Bill 50, which requires lessors
(and others) to collect fees for disposal of hazardous electronic
devices. Unfortunately, the burden won't be lifted just yet, if
ever, as the legislature dumped the amendment on the Assembly floor
on August 27, 2004 and sent it to Governor Schwarzenegger for
signature on September 3, 2004.
[Top]
7. Training Offered; Web Seminar:
True Leases Under Attack - Do You Know Why?
Reader Feedback
Thanks to all the readers of BLN for their
comments about the August edition.
One reader e-mailed:
"We met at last years' ELA. Your newsletter is awesome...." Another reader said: "Great job, David! I
will look forward to seeing you at the ELA!" Offering a bit of humor and solace, a third reader
observed: "Another great set of articles this month. I am
sorry to hear that your book, Business Leasing for Dummies is
going out of print. I assume from my receipt of BLN, that the movie
rights have not sold and you still have to work for a living."
Yes, indeed, I am working for a living as a
practicing lawyer and welcome your contact and business!
Recent Publications
Here are two feature articles I wrote that were
published last month:
-
Beating True Lease Challenges: A Lessor's
Guide to Structuring and Defending True Leases, LNJ Leasing
Newsletter, by David G. Mayer (August 2004).
-
Bankruptcy Court Provides Guidance on True
Leasing of Software, ELA 's Equipment Leasing Today, by
David G. Mayer (August-September 2004).
Upcoming Speeches at ELA Annual Convention
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, I will lead a panel
at the 43rd Annual Equipment Leasing Association Convention,
entitled "Back to the Future: True Lease Opportunities and
Structuring." The panel is scheduled for 10:30am to 12:00 p.m.
and is repeated from 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m., October 26th. The
Conference will be held from October 24 - 26th, at the Marriott
Desert Springs Resort and Spa in Palm Desert, California. For more
information and registration, click on ELA Convention.
Training - Substance the Easy Way!
To help improve your business operations, deal
processing and risk management, I offer private training seminars
tailored to your specific needs at your designated location. My
interactive and informative training includes topics I cover in BLN.
I customize the format and content for your specific training needs-
no canned programs.
After one of my private
training sessions, here's what one of the company's senior managers
said: "David, thanks again for an excellent presentation. You
helped us tackle a complex, but important topic. Your expertise is
first-rate and you are an excellent teacher to boot -- that's a rare
combination."
Feel free to call me at (214) 758-1545 to discuss
the possibilities.
[Top]
8. About Patton Boggs LLP and
My Practice
As
you may be aware, I am a part of the Patton Boggs LLP Business
Transactions Group in our Dallas office. Patton Boggs LLP is a law
firm of about 400 lawyers located globally in multiple locations.
The firm has extensive capabilities in over 50 areas of legal
practice that include leasing, secured transactions, personal
property financing, securitizations, syndications, power project and
mezzanine financing, bankruptcy, real estate, public policy,
litigation, intellectual property and technology law, and much
more.
The
leasing and secured transactions practices regularly involve the
buying, selling, financing and leasing of real and personal property
of all kinds, including business aircraft, energy, facility,
production, power plant, technology and health care assets. We also
structure, negotiate and close secured transactions of all kinds,
tax-exempt, state and federal leasing arrangements and corporate and
portfolio acquisitions, among a full range of financing and
acquisition transactions. Despite the improving economy, we continue
to assist our clients with troubled deals and bankruptcies,
including repossessions, lift stay actions, true lease contests,
deficiency litigation, workouts and forbearance arrangements.
If I, or any other lawyer at Patton Boggs LLP, can
help you with your legal or business challenges, feel free to call
me call me at (214) 758-1545 or e-mail me at dmayer@pattonboggs.com for information
about any of these areas or the many others available at Patton
Boggs LLP, or to discuss anything I have written in Business
Leasing News. We welcome the opportunity to build a relationship
with you!
[Top]
A
Message From the Founder, David G. Mayer
Lease Bashing
Just
as the political season ramps up where candidates bash each other,
the media has taken a negative shot at the leasing industry, with
little basis, knowledge or justification. In an article entitled Let the Rent of Equipment Beware, New York
Times (Aug. 12, 2004) New York Times writer Elizabeth
Olson pens a diatribe of how leasing companies have taken advantage
of small business, with rising complaints and court fights that
follow. She says in part:
Add
equipment-leasing deals to the list of financial pitfalls for
small businesses. Last year, the number of complaints involving
them at Better Business Bureaus across the country soared
eightfold, to 772, from just 98 in 2002, according to the Council
of Better Business Bureaus, an umbrella group. The surge placed
questionable equipment-leasing practices high on the list of top
problems at the group, based in Arlington, Va.
What
Ms. Olson fails to mention is that the Better Business Bureaus have
had massive increases in complaints generally. In fact, much of her
research stems from Virginia, where the BBB also recently said:
U.S. BBBs processed 773,042 complaints in 2003,
a 23.5 percent jump in the 626,081 complaints processed in 2002.
'The growing complaint volume doesn't
necessarily indicate a decline in service by the business
community; it's more a reflection of the increased reliance on the
BBB system and the tremendous effort BBB staff persons devote to
helping resolve disputes that arise in the marketplace,' Hunter
said.
In another 964,666 instances, BBBs in the U.S.
assisted the public by providing complaint counseling or referrals
to appropriate agencies or organizations.
The complaints described by Ms. Olson for leasing
represents less than one percent of the BBB complaints. Ms. Olson
omitted to say that BBB has enhanced its online complaint system and
fielded a wide variety of complaints from a host of businesses. See:
BBB Services Nationwide Surged in 2003, BBB Services Nationwide Surged in 2003;
Businesses Ranked by Inquiries and Complaints, BBB Current
Alerts, May 4, 2004.
Ms. Olson's observations suggest an area of
concern for $208 billion per year leasing industry. But her analysis
includes a misleading discussion of typical commitment fees and
lacks any description of hell-or-high water clauses that may have
caused lessors to stand on their rights. Further, she omits that
about 80 percent of all businesses use leasing to acquire some or
all of their equipment.
Perhaps Ms. Olson should take another closer look
at this one narrow part of the leasing business and gain a more
complete understanding of the value of leasing and the diversity of
the industry so she can write a more balanced article next time. Her
generalizations of apparent problems to the whole leasing industry
and negative impact on small business lacks knowledge and
appreciation for the value that leasing provides daily to small
businesses worldwide.
Have a great September and a strong start to the
fourth quarter.
Thanks to the BLN Staff
I extend a special thank you to my editors at
Patton Boggs LLP for their comments on this edition, Adrian McCoy
Sheila McCoy and our primary web site review partner, Jeff Turner.
The technical team, consisting in part of George Barber and Winston
Jackson, provides you the easy-to-use e-mail navigation and artistic
appearance of BLN. Claire Campbell, our Chief Librarian provided
research for BLN. Finally, in a special appearance, Anne Mayer, my
spouse and a professional writer, edited BLN this month. Anne helped
develop the original concept for BLN in January 2002.
PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL
TO OTHERS. You may, for this purpose, disregard Patton
Boggs' distribution restriction at the bottom of this
email.
[Top]
All the best,
David
David G. Mayer
Founder and
Publisher Patton Boggs LLP 2001 Ross Avenue Suite
3000 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 758-1545 (phone) (214)
758-1550 (fax) E-Mail: dmayer@pattonboggs.com
©
David G. Mayer 2004
NOTE: You may receive BLN from other
people and that often occurs. To SUBSCRIBE, change your address or to change
your e-mail format, simply click
here. To UNSUBSCRIBE, click
here. To correspond with BLN, send your message to bln@pattonboggs.com.
Thanks.
The "For Dummies"
part of my book, Business Leasing For Dummies (BLFD)®, is a
registered trademark of Wiley Publishing, Inc.
Disclaimer:
BLN information is not intended to constitute, and is not a
substitute for, legal or other advice. Comments, tips,
warnings, predictions, etc. in BLN provide general insights
only. You should consult appropriate counsel or other
advisers, taking into account your relevant circumstances and
issues. The Disclaimer linked here also shall be
deemed to apply to Business Leasing News in any e-mail format.
BLN does not endorse or validate information contained in any
link or research material used in BLN. You should
independently evaluate such information or material. Readers
are urged to print information under linked pages as they are
subject to change over time. Comments made in BLN do not
represent the views of Patton Boggs LLP, but rather those of
David G. Mayer. |
[Top] | |