|
Leasing News 2002 Complaints Bulletin Board Year-End Report by Christopher Menkin, editor/publisher Over $300,000 was returned to leasing applicants from “advance rentals” or “deposits,” primarily from leasing discounters
or brokers with “private label” non-recourse lines of credit. In the year 2002, Leasing News received 237 complaints sent
for the Bulletin Board. We received
so many, we changed the name on the tool bar to “Complaints Bulletin
Board. “ Our Web Trend report on visitors to our website www.leasingnews.org shows “The List,” number one, followed by “Archives,” people doing
a search for a subject or past article, and “Complaints Bulletin Board”
is the third most visited. The original concept in early 2000, was to put an automatic
“post” program on line, but at the insistence of Leasing News Advisor Bob
Teichman, we “screen them,” getting all sides. I am glad we did that. Not just for legal reasons, but we have been able offset the poor reputation
being made by the few...and get “advance rentals” returned. Several states have
laws regarding “advance rentals,” but the reality is, when it is less than $1,000, or even
a few thousand dollars, business people don’t have the money to hire an
attorney to pursue their claim. Many
have been $10,000 or more, but the business decision is not to spend $5,000 to chase money they believe
they will never see again. If there is one observation to make, almost all have made
complaints to the Better Business Bureau. The BBB has been a good source to learn about how many complaints have been filed against a leasing
company Unfortunately, the BBB
has no “police” authority. If
many of the businesses were to check out BBB first, they would save a
lot of cash, avoid the frustration and disappoint of not only
not getting a lease for several months, but realizing they had been had. In almost every case
reported to law enforcement, action has been taken, especially when
the applicant follows up with the original report.
Most people think it is not fast enough. They report if it were “big money,” the law would make it a higher priority to prosecute. While this
may or may not be true, local law enforcement does follow up. In different
states, the state attorney general’s office are not only active on these
complaints, but have a lot of experience in handling them. The FBI gets involved on the large cases.
One thing for sure, once funding sources and others read the complaint posted in Leasing News, they become very leery
about doing business with the broker or leasing company. For this reason
alone, Leasing News has been
able to get many “advance rental” returned..
We were able to have send back over $300,000 in advance rentals
or deposits, some from two companies who eventually made the bulletin
board. Only 13 companies were actually listed in 2002. If the money is returned, there is no complaint.
31 the applicant or lessee had signed a commitment letter or paper (one where we had many complaints, including form ex-employees and salesmen, had applicants sign a form that any money advance would not be returned for any reason. Whether this would
be legal in many states, the
fact is the applicant was aware they would not get their money back.) Over
two dozen or more were “civil disputes,” meaning both sides had issues that did not make it clear
to us that the complaint was legitimate. Several we directed to contact the lessor, or superbroker, or person who made the original
commitment. A few were real disputes, we called a “civil matter,” meaning for a court or legal arbitrator. MSM Capital we were able to get back almost $80,000 in advance rentals before the company filed bankruptcy. In the beginning, MSM Capital President Michael Cingari said it was his bookkeeping
department or a mix-up in communications, but after about a dozen, it
became clear it was not. The
bankruptcy showed creditors owed $1.2 million in advance rentals. GSC Capital is listed on the Complaints Bulletin Board, the
founders of this company have either negotiated or returned the full amounts of all complaints submitted
to them, over $50,000. The original complaint has been satisfied, as have been all
the others received after it was posted. GSC
is no longer in business. We were also able to get money back in the beginning when
the Funding Tree was first contacted. As
the number increased and it became evident money was not going to be returned, they moved to the State of
Nevada. Many of the complaints are also “miscommunication, “ such
as this one from the new general manager of a mid-city television station:
“I have recently been named General Manager for *****Broadcasting
and have found several problems with the leases. Is it legal for Balboa Capital to originate
a lease-$73,000-and sell it to Imperial Business for $84,000. I have several "messes" to clean
up. Needless to say, "The
leasing industry needs to be regulated."
No more leases for *****! I
have contacted an attorney, but no attorney seems to have an answer.
Previous management did sign the contract, but would you like to wake
up tomorrow and your mortgage company has sold your $100,000 mortgage
to another financial institution, and your principal balance is now
$110,000? Legal action should be taken against the leasing
industry. If they are protected,
we intend to start a national campaign against the leasing industry.
I look forward to hearing from you.” Basically, we explained the assignment of his home mortgage,
then the lease by multiplying the number of payments remaining, adding if
the purchase option was assigned, it may also be added along with late
charges, personal property tax, and the number would be higher that the cost
of equipment. The most important fact is the lease payment did not change.
We assured him it was common for transaction like these to be assigned,
went into a history, and would be glad to contact Balboa to confirm
this. The assignment or problems due to the assignment, especially
Advanta and Textron, have been among the many complaints. When we first started, most of the complaints to be posted
came from readers, then from “broker” referrals as they were running
into customers with “poor experiences.” 2002 was different. If we post one complaint, such as about GSC Capital or Leasecomm, we are found in browsers by people searching for information
about the company. It has
come to the point, that the great majority of communications are not from leasing brokers, although we
still get :”referrals,” but direct from the internet. The browsers have put Leasing News on the top, especially regarding “advance
rentals.” **** We look at the listing on the bulletin board as a “failure.”
We prefer to see a “settlement,” rather than a complaint.. *** Our F.A.Q. page is near the top for Leasing Company Complaints: How Do You Handle Accusations About Advance Rentals? Leasing News does not want to print accusations. We confirm
all information given to us before publishing. We verify all information
given to us. We want to be "fair and accurate." Our role is
industry news. We encourage your communication, but we have an adopted
policy from the date of our inception: http://www.leasingnews.org/policy.htm If you have a complaint or knowledge of inappropriate conduct,
behavior, possible illegal activity, the proper venue for this is a
written complaint to your leasing association's standards and ethic
committee. If the company you are writing about is a member, they may
be expelled or censured. One of the many reasons to belong to an association is to
promote ethics and fairness. Leasing associations have committees composed of professionals
in the industry who work for free and consider all written complaints
or information about conduct submitted to them. It is your best "protection." Exchange business
with the members of your association. If there is a difficulty or a problem, you have a "lifeline"
to call. Join an association just for this protection (there are other
reasons, but this is an excellent one ). We also invite all readers to utilize our "Customer
Complaint" Bulletin Board. http://www.leasingnews.org/bulletin_board.htm |
|