|
Bulletin
Board Complaint Weekly Up-date 1)
It
appears the attorney who could not collect from a previous client, has
worked out a compromise. They
hired an attorney who asked us not to
print the story as he thought he could settle it, which he appears to have
done. The original bill was $15,000,
but it appears the
“old” attorney will settle for $10,000---and now he has to collect it. Will keep you
informed. (The “old” attorney new the applicant well, and had handled case
before, so didn’t collect a “retainer.”
Reminds me of the old adage, “Watch
out for your friends as you know what your enemies will do.” 2)
Applicant
says a broker could not do the lease, but has not returned the advance
rental. It was only two weeks
since the promise, so we called the broker, explained
that we told the applicant 30 days would be reasonable, nevertheless,
the broker sent the advance rental back next day Federal Express. The applicant says
he has the check, but we told him not to celebrate until it clears. 3)
This
one really turned strange. This
was for a $1.2 million deal. Allegedly the
lessee had dealt with two brokers, one to the other, who found this
company who
want a 1% commitment fee, and the brokers thought it was not going to go
through. The company did not
belong to any leasing association, had no website,
and was in a small town, all strange.
The form signed allowed the company
to keep $1500 for “expenses.” In
investigating this, the vendor was
the company that fronted the $12,360.00 fee.
The applicant wanted to
go somewhere else, and didn’t want to get into a fight about who owed
what or continue to receive promises that the deal would go together (
the company had the application for over two months and kept asking for
one thing or another-you know how that goes.)
In advising the applicant
to write off the $12,360 and start looking for a new source, we
learned where the up-front money came from.
The vendor then sent their legal people the company settled on
$3,810.00; they then sent back $8,550.00. The
original broker told Leasing News, “I feel ****** was in this deal only
to collect the proposal fee. He
never showed any interest in moving the deal forward, always maintaining
that everything was moving along well.” Again,
know who you are dealing with. You
stand a better chance when dealing
with a member of your leasing association, who has a website, and the
company attends leasing conference.
Now that is not always correct, as
many of us have found out, but is sure is better than dealing with someone you
know little about, and most likely, survives on the advance rentals they
keep. Remember, “ When you sleep with dogs, you get fleas.” I
always think of that saying told
to me by my late mentor Mac Pollock of
Key Lease in Redwood City, California.
I also think of well-known attorney Joe Bonanno’s Question: “Does
the company belong to NAELB?” Meaning,
if they are a member of the National Association of Leasing Brokers
and want to remain a member, they better follow the code of ethics. So
when you run into someone you don’t know, “Ask Joe Bonanno’s Question.” |
|