Kit Menkin’s Leasing News

                   www.leasingnews.org  Friday, 17, 2002

Accurate, fair and unbiased news for the equipment Leasing Industry

 

           Headlines----

 

New IBM Chief Confirms Layoffs  

    Tyco says comfortable with estimates, cash situation

          Tyco plans to pay off $10 billion in debt

                Personal Bankruptcy Filings Up 15.2 Percent

                       Comdisco Chapter 11 plan, disclosure filed with SEC

                          6 Ex-Employees Win Judgment Against MSM Capital

                                 Mortgage rates move higher this week

     Teamsters push UPS on contract, Union to Hold Strike Vote

        AOL Time Warner Execs Admit Missteps—Big Time

          At AOL, Parting Without the Sweet Sorrow

            Fitch Rates $1.07B CIT Equipment Collateral 2002-VT1

                    Congress Must Act Now to Keep Banks Out of Real Estate

                       Dell Profit Exceeds Firm's Forecast

 Sunrise International Leasing  Reports Strong 1st Q 2002 Results

   U.S. Economy: Production Rises; Core Inflation Tame

       Comdisco Fiscal2nd Q and Six Month Financial Results

 

 

### Denotes Press Release

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Where is Johnnie Johnson, who used to do CLP training?   If anyone knows his

e-mail address or where he is, please let us know.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Jim Merrilees says he will not be at the MAEL Golf Tournament this weekend.

We will never know how well he does on the golf course.  Evidently, business

comes first before pleasure with the Merrilees.  Bummer.

 

 

 

New IBM Chief Confirms Layoffs
 

(www.f**kedcompany.com reported:

 

“In addition to the Vermont layoffs I reported a few days ago, IBM is preparing to lay off 10% of its US workforce across the board -- word is d-day is May 23, 2002. Two-months severance expected. IBM Global Services will be the department most affected.
When: 5/9/2002”

 

By Steve Lohr, New York Times

In his first meeting with Wall Street analysts since becoming chief executive of International Business

Machines, Samuel J. Palmisano declared that the company would emerge from the downturn in the computer industry stronger than ever. But he also confirmed that IBM would be cutting its work force by thousands to tighten its belt during the current slump.

Palmisano refused to detail the extent of the planned payroll trimming, but he seemed to suggest the numbers could be somewhat higher than recent reports. Last week, executives close to the company said IBM would cut its work force in the first half of this year by roughly 9,000 employees, or fewer than 3 percent of its 320,000 employees worldwide. Most of the job cuts, these executives said, would be in the United States, where IBM employs 160,000 people.

Palmisano said IBM was steadily working to improve productivity and cut expenses by $1 billion or $2 billion a year. Reducing employment in some operations to mirror shifts in business, especially in the services business, has occurred even in good times, he said. That kind of attrition, he said, has typically amounted to 15,000 jobs a year.

But when the technology sector was buoyant, those cutbacks would be more than offset by additional hiring, especially in fast-growing parts of the services business, increasing IBM's total employment. Last year, IBM's revenues declined 3 percent and most analysts expect it to decline another 3 percent in 2002.

One analyst noted that if IBM held steady its revenue per employee - one measure of corporate productivity - that would imply cutbacks of 20,000 workers. While agreeing with the overall analysis, Palmisano said the company's businesses vary, so simple head-count calculations can be misleading.

Still, he observed, "If we did not hire anybody, we'd be down 15,000."

Palmisano avoided being more specific, but hinted of an announcement soon. "You'll hear more about what we're doing to address those issues," he said. "That's pretty straightforward."

Palmisano, who became chief executive in March, replacing Louis V. Gerstner Jr., spent most of his hour-long appearance in New York discussing IBM's long-term strategy and the technology industry.

Palmisano made no specific predictions of when the industry might rebound, later this year or next year. But when it does, he said, the information technology business should grow at more than twice the rate of the economy, somewhat slower than in the late 1990's but still solid.

Palmisano compared the current period to the economic downturn at the start of the 1980's, when the personal computer industry really got under way, and to the early 1990's, when PC's linked in small networks, or client-server computing, had its start. Each time, he said, economic slowdowns forced companies to look for ways to use technology to lift productivity.

Palmisano said, mainstream businesses understand that using Internet technology can help them save costs and increase productivity. IBM, he said, is well positioned to help companies use networked technology and is gaining market share in software, data-serving computers, storage and services.

"We don't like this economic environment, but we are seizing the opportunity it presents," Palmisano said. "IBM is going to exit this downturn much stronger than we entered."

 

 

____________________________________________________________.   

 

 

Tyco says comfortable with estimates, cash situation

 

 

NEW YORK, (Reuters) - Embattled conglomerate Tyco International Ltd. (NYSE:TYC - News), which makes products ranging from diapers to burglar alarms, said on Thursday it was comfortable with Wall Street estimates for the current quarter and full year.

 

Chief Financial Officer Mark Swartz also said he expected to "monetize" the company's finance arm, CIT Group, by the end of June. Tyco bought CIT last year for about $10 billion and filed in April to sell it in a $7.15 billion initial public offering of common stock.

 

Tyco expects to see sequential improvement in the electronics and health care sectors.

 

Analysts expect Tyco to report earnings of 57 cents per share for the third quarter, with estimates ranging from 48 cents to 60 cents, according to tracking firm Thomson Financial/First Call. For the year, analysts peg Tyco at a profit of $2.58 a share.

 

In a new report, ratings agency Standard and Poor's included Tyco in a list of 15 investment-grade companies that could face a cash crunch.

 

The CIT offering would give Tyco breathing room in its drive to refinance its debt, $3.25 billion of which is coming due in February.

 

On Thursday's call, the company said its cash flow would be sufficient to pay off its immediate debt without a CIT sale. Including cash from a CIT offering, it said it expected to pay off $10 billion of debt, reducing outstanding debt to about $17 billion, from about $27 billion.

 

In the quarterly report filed on Wednesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Tyco said it may book a gain of as much as $1.5 billion if it goes ahead with the CIT transaction, CIT's credit ratings are upgraded and it gets "cost effective" access to unsecured credit markets.

 

But Tyco predicted it may face a charge of as much as $750 million if those things do not happen.

 

"At this time, we believe that separation from Tyco, subsequent credit upgrades and access to the unsecured credit markets on a cost effective basis is the most likely outcome," the company said in the SEC filing.

 

Tyco shares have lost roughly two-thirds of their value this year, due to questions about its accounting and corporate ethics, several earnings warnings, credit issues, and a loss of confidence in its management after reversals in strategy.

 

The stock rose $1.14, or 5.87 percent, to close at $20.56 on the New York Stock Exchange.

 

 

 

Tyco plans to pay off $10 billion in debt

 

By Harry R. Weber, Associated Press

 

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) Tyco International Ltd. plans to pay off about $10 billion of its $27 billion in debt after it spins off its lending division, and is on course to do so by the end of June, a company executive said Thursday.

 

The figure includes the $7.2 billion the huge conglomerate hopes to generate from its CIT unit through an initial public stock offering or whatever the division would fetch through a sale. Tyco would pay off the balance of the $10 billion with cash.

 

A worst-case scenario would require Tyco to refinance $3.25 billion in debt when Tyco's next payment comes due in February, chief financial officer Mark Swartz said in a conference call with investors.

 

''Our financial position as we sit right now is stronger than it was a year ago today,'' Swartz said.

 

Swartz said the company is on track to shed CIT by June, but did not disclose further details.

 

Swartz said there is still weak demand for some of Tyco's core products, including plastic products and telecommunications. There have also been added pressures on sales because of Tyco's announcement last month that it would not sell its plastics unit and was abandoning a breakup plan announced in January.

 

The struggle to overcome weak demand and months of negative publicity over the company's accounting practices was underscored in a quarterly filing Tyco submitted late Wednesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Tyco, which is based in Bermuda but has headquarters in Exeter, N.H., said it must focus on its core businesses before it can return to a strategy of growth through acquisitions.

 

''We anticipate reducing the number of acquisitions we complete prospectively, and, therefore, expect that our growth rate in revenues and earnings from acquisitions will also be reduced as compared to prior quarters,'' Tyco said.

 

Rob Plaza, an analyst with Morningstar Inc. in Chicago, said it's time for Tyco to dispense with the rhetoric and get results. The company's stock has slid 66 percent since Jan. 1

 

''I think the question is, 'Will anyone take management at face value?' I don't think they will. Tyco has to prove what it says it can do,'' Plaza said.

 

The SEC filing provided revenue and expense numbers for the six months ending March 31. It also detailed thousands of layoffs at Tyco subsidiaries during that period.

 

The filing said about 12,366 jobs were eliminated at Tyco during the six months ending March 31, including about 7,100 that had taken place but were not announced until Tyco revealed on April 25 that it was reversing course on the breakup plan.

 

But Tyco's overall work force stood at 277,000 employees as of April 1 leaving the company with 30,000 more jobs than the company reported in October. Spokeswoman Maryanne Kane said the increase was primarily due to acquisitions.

 

Swartz said in the conference call that ''the bottom has been met'' in Tyco's core businesses. He added that Tyco expects $36 billion in sales this year.

 

Shares of Tyco have been battered in recent months because of Enron-inspired accounting questions.

 

Tyco shares closed at $20.56, up $1.14 , or almost 6 percent, Thursday on the New York Stock Exchange.

 

On the Net:

 

http://www.tyco.com

 

 

Personal Bankruptcy Filings Up 15.2 Percent in 12- Month Period

 

By Marcy Gordon

 

AP Business Writer

 

Bankruptcy filings by American consumers jumped 15.2 percent in the 12 months ended March 31, fueled by the strong spending that helped make the recession shallow, the government said Thursday.

 

Personal bankruptcies hit a record 1,464,961 during the period, up from 1,271,865 in the 12 months ending March 31, 2001, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts reported.

 

"Consumers did their part to make the recession a recessionette," said Samuel Gerdano, executive director of the American Bankruptcy Institute, a group of bankruptcy judges, lawyers and experts. "Consumers still have confidence in the economy."

 

Gerdano noted that consumers were lured by free-financing deals on vehicles while lower interest rates brought a surge in mortgage refinancing that put more spending money in their pockets.

 

2001 already was a boom year for bankruptcies amid the economic downturn.

 

The majority of consumer bankruptcy filings continued to be under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which allows people to dissolve their credit- card and other debts. Chapter 7 filings during the 12-month period jumped 17.2 percent, to 1,059,777.

 

In return for having their debts erased, people in Chapter 7 cases often turn their property over to a bankruptcy trustee, except for basic necessities such as a car, clothing and work tools. Property with value is sold to pay creditors. Debtors generally are allowed to keep some personal items and possibly some of the equity in their home, depending on state laws.

 

 

 (We sure know this in the leasing business. It was the 1974’s since I have seen

so many companies file BK on leases. editor )

 

_____________________________________________________________

 

Comdisco Chapter 11 plan, disclosure filed with SEC

 

By Associated Press

 

ROSEMONT, Ill. (Dow Jones Newswires) Comdisco Inc. filed a proposed joint plan of reorganization in late April with the federal bankruptcy court for the Northern District of Illinois.

 

The Rosemont, Ill., computer services company said its plan calls for Comdisco to operate with three units and continue to sell or run-off all of its asset portfolios, a process which the company expects will take up to three years to complete.

 

The company has been selling assets since filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last July. Comdisco's international operations aren't included in the Chapter 11 reorganization.

 

Comdisco filed its plan with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with a form 8-K filing, and the company will mail the plan to creditors and voting shareholders following bankruptcy court approval.

 

The company said a hearing on the disclosure statement is scheduled for May 31, and a confirmation hearing is scheduled for July 30.

 

Comdisco said all of its businesses, including those that filed for Chapter 11, are conducting normal operations.

 

In April, Comdisco agreed to sell some of its domestic health care leasing assets to GE Capital's Healthcare Financial Services unit for $165 million and the assumption of debt. GE capital is a unit of General Electric Co.

 

Comdisco expects to cut about 180 positions, or 20 percent of its staff, as part of its restructuring.

 

Comdisco's plan proposes that its general unsecured creditors receive their prorata share of an initial cash distribution, which the company plans to fund by current cash on hand from asset sales and cash flow from operations, less amounts necessary to establish a cash reserve for other payments and operations.

 

Comdisco expects to make an initial cash distribution of about $2 billion, if its plan is approved, while it expects the ultimate recovery to unsecured creditors will be about 87 percent of their claims, subject to provisions.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Six Ex-Employees Win Judgment Against MSM Capital, Southern California

 

Posted on the Leasing Rag (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theleasingrag/)

 

“The three remaining employees who had cases up at the Labor Board now have
also WON their cases. Total decision amount just over $125k for all
involved plus another previous decision in favor of a former employee
two months ago for 23k, grand total $148K give or take.”



 

 MSM President Mike Cingari, former president of Colonial Pacific Leasing, states the six employees were dismissed after commissions were cut back, and he caught them brokering to other leasing companies. The six employees deny this, saying they  were owed back commissions not paid. Evidently the California State Labor Board  has agreed.

 

 

“ The Disgruntled Six.....$136,000

 

“MSM Capital. $0”

 

(Name with held until May 28th )

 

(on the 28th, the first appeal will be heard.  If he loses it will toss out all of our appeals as well and we will get paid.)

 

In an earlier interview with Mike Cingari, he said he would appeal the matter should

he lose at this level.  The interview concerned three complaints Leasing News has

received regarding advance rentals or deposits not being returned and wanting

their situation posted on the Leasing News Bulletin Board.  The complaints by

the applicants were faxed to MSM Capital; the last one May 9th.

 

 Mr. Cingari was not available to respond to Leasing News

 

(More news to follow as it develops)

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mortgage rates move higher this week

 

       

ASSOCIATED PRESS

 

 

WASHINGTON – Mortgage rates around the country rose this week, but still remained below the 7 percent mark.

 

Freddie Mac, the mortgage company, reported that the average interest rate on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages climbed to 6.89 percent this week from 6.79 the previous week, according to a nationwide survey released Thursday. A year ago this time, 30-year mortgages averaged 7.14 percent.

 

Rates on 30-year mortgages hit a low of 6.45 percent in early November, their lowest point since Freddie Mac began conducting its nationwide survey in 1971.

 

Even though rates have moved higher since that time, analysts believe that mortgage rates will be fairly stable this year and will continue to support the housing market.

 

Fifteen-year mortgages, a popular option for refinancing, rose 6.37 percent from 6.27 percent the week before. A year ago, 15-year mortgages averaged 6.67 percent.

 

On one-year adjustable-rate mortgages, lenders were asking an average initial rate of 4.81 percent, up slightly from 4.80 percent the previous week. Last year this time, one-year ARMs averaged 5.81 percent.

 

These rates do not include add-on fees known as points, which averaged around 0.7 percent of the loan amount for all three types of mortgages last week.

 

"With mortgage rates continuing to remain below 7 percent, the housing industry will still experience a good year and continue to support the overall economy," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac's chief economist.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

_______________________________________________________

Teamsters push UPS on contract

Union to hold vote on strike this weekend

 

(UPS Leasing has plenty of cash and the Teamsters want some of it )

 

George Raine, S.F. Chronicle Staff Writer

 

 

The 230,000 Teamsters employed by United Parcel Service will vote this weekend whether or not to authorize a strike that could, if contract negotiations are fruitless, commence Aug. 1.

 

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters struck UPS for 15 days in 1997, disrupting commerce in the United States and causing the world's largest package-delivery company to lose $750 million in revenue.

 

That strike, the only one in the Teamsters' 75-year relationship with UPS, served as an incentive for beginning the negotiations early this year, in February, rather than in May, when they started in 1997, said Norman Black, UPS spokesman at the company's Atlanta headquarters. There are about 10,000 Teamster-represented UPS employees in the Bay Area.

 

The union and UPS have conflicting opinions on the pace of the contract talks in Chicago. The two sides have reached tentative settlement on 13 of 32 supplemental contracts covering workplace issues and will take up major economic matters next week.

 

In an indication that the talks are progressing, the company said it believes that all the supplementals can be resolved this week.

 

The union thinks otherwise.

 

"From day one, UPS has said they want an early contract because of their concern about losing customer base" if service is disrupted, said Bret Caldwell, a Teamsters spokesman at its Washington, D.C., headquarters. "But we have seen no movement to indicate that there will be an early settlement, much less resolution by the time of the contract's expiration on July 31."

 

"It's time to jump-start negotiations," said Teamsters General President James Hoffa, in announcing the coming strike authorization vote. "It is time to get down to business. It is time to address the issues that are important to our members."

 

The vote, said UPS' Black, "is a normal part of the negotiating process and always has been and should not be taken out of context as a barometer of the progress of negotiations." He added that the company has not seen "any significant diversion" or decline in business that might be attributable to customer unease about labor negotiations.

 

Chuck Mack, the Teamsters' Western regional vice president based in Oakland and a participant in the Chicago talks, said, "We are looking for solid wage increases -- solid money -- that will give Teamsters the opportunity to afford to live in the Bay Area. This is a very powerful, very wealthy company. It has done extremely well. But it is the people who are driving the trucks who made them the money, and they needed to be compensated fairly."

 

E-mail George Raine at graine@sfchronicle.com.

 

____________________________________________________

AOL Time Warner Execs Admit Missteps –Big Time

NEW YORK (AP) - AOL Time Warner Inc. executives acknowledged that they made serious missteps over the past year in overpromising financial results, and pledged to work hard to restore the company's battered stock price and credibility with investors.

 

Speaking at the company's annual meeting Thursday, the executives also marked the official transition of power at the world's largest media company as 30-year veteran Gerald Levin stepped aside as chief executive and was replaced by Richard Parsons.

 

``This past year has been difficult, and things didn't go quite as we expected,'' chairman Steve Case said in opening remarks to the capacity crowd of shareholders at the Apollo Theater in Harlem. ``We have to work to regain your confidence.''

 

``We have made some mistakes in the past year,'' Case said, such as setting profit targets that were too high and then sticking with them too long. But he also said the company was ``getting its house in order and will deliver on the premise and promise of the merger.''

 

AOL Time Warner's stock has been savaged in recent months after the company failed to meet targets for profit growth and also sprung a number of unpleasant surprises on investors - including a massive $54 billion write-off to reflect a loss in the company's value since the merger, and losses at its AOL Europe division that were larger than expected.

 

The shares have tumbled about 40 percent since the beginning of the year and are now off a total of about 70 percent since the merger of America Online and Time Warner was announced in January 2000. They edged up 5 cents to $18.90 Thursday on the New York Stock Exchange.

 

At the meeting, several shareholders expressed frustration at the poor performance of the company's stock, and demanded explanations from management for what they planned to do in order to get the company back on track.

Michael Hariton, a 36-year-old private investor, delivered a blistering tirade against the executives, chastising Case for spending time away from the job for family reasons and demanding that they bring down the company's $27 billion in debt.

 

``We're paying you guys to be full-time employees. Get the job done,'' Hariton said, his face reddening. ``These are our hard-earned dollars, and you have decimated them. ... Get working.''

 

Robert Schue, 62, a semiretired free-lance writer, asked managers why there were ``replicating the Taj Mahal in Columbus Circle'' - a reference to the construction of the company's lavish new headquarters building in Manhattan - after they posted a loss of $54 billion and their share price is under $20.

 

``I think there's something seriously wrong with the management of the company,'' Schue said in an interview later. ``My five hundred shares may not be a lot in the grand scheme of things, but they are a lot for me. My savings are at risk.''

 

Parsons, speaking to reporters immediately after the meeting, said he was relieved that the shareholders' meeting wasn't more rancorous.

 

``I thought the tone of the meeting was more gracious and respectful than I anticipated,'' Parsons said. ``I thought the shareholders were realistic and respectful, in the main.''

 

On the Net:

 

Company Web site: http://www.aoltimewarner.com

 

At AOL, Parting Without the Sweet Sorrow

 

By GERALDINE FABRIKANT with SETH SCHIESEL

  New York Times

 

 

After AOL Time Warner's annual meeting yesterday, Richard D. Parsons told reporters that the shareholders who gathered at the Apollo Theater in Harlem had been "more gracious and respectful than I had anticipated."

 

Mr. Parsons must have expected torches and pitchforks. While his coronation as AOL Time Warner's chief executive went off as planned yesterday, it was clear that the shareholders were irate. They, after all, have suffered the collapse of the stock price, which has lost about 64 percent of its value in the last year.

 

"These are our hard-earned dollars that we trusted

 

 

to you, and you have decimated us," said one of many angry shareholders who strode to a microphone during the question-and-answer period. Another referred unhappily to the huge headquarters tower that the company is building on the West Side of Manhattan, saying the company was "replicating the Taj Mahal on Columbus Circle" while shareholders nurse their losses.

 

Mr. Parsons and Stephen M. Case, the company's chairman, stoically braved the barrage. But the executive who did not take questions was the man whom Mr. Parsons is replacing: Gerald M. Levin, who retired yesterday after 30 years at the company and its predecessors, the last decade as chief executive.

 

Mr. Levin gave a brief farewell address in which he thanked shareholders for "faith, hope and, above all, patience." Most of the audience of perhaps 1,400 replied with a polite standing ovation. But others sat in stony silence. For while it is Mr. Parsons who must now try to fix AOL Time Warner, it is Mr. Levin whom some shareholders, analysts and industry executives blame for the current state of the company.

 

During his career, first at Time Inc., then Time Warner and finally AOL Time Warner, Mr. Levin knew his share of successes — primarily as a deal maker. But he leaves under a cloud of perceptions that the 2000 merger that created AOL Time Warner may have been one deal too many.

 

"You just lost $54 billion," an angry shareholder told the executives yesterday, referring to the noncash charge that AOL Time Warner took in the first quarter to account for the company's plunge in value since the merger. "Where'd that come from?" the accuser continued. "Our pockets — the shareholders — not the options you got."

 

Because Mr. Levin is expected to continue as an adviser to the company, analysts and company executives are wary of discussing his legacy on the record. But a recurrent criticism is that Mr. Levin gave away too much of the company when he agreed to merger terms in January 2000 that granted America Online 55 percent of Time Warner for AOL stock — just months before the bursting of the Internet bubble.

 

No one can predict the future of the stock market, of course. But industry executives also fault Mr. Levin for having overestimated the opportunities for complements between Time Warner's conventional media holdings and AOL's Internet business.

 

"When he sold to AOL, he sold for nothing," one industry executive said. "It was pretty clear that the great synergies Jerry talked about were unrealistic."

 

Mr. Levin's earlier deal-making record was also mixed. In 1989, when he was vice chairman at Time Inc., he was a lead negotiator of the merger between Time and Warner Communications. Because Paramount Communications opened a bidding war by trying to acquire Time, the Time Warner merger ended up being completed at a price that left the new company $18 billion in debt.

 

The terms of that deal also allowed the Warner executives' stock options to vest upon the merger's completion and they were immediately granted new options. The Time executives did not have comparable option packages, producing enormous resentment in some quarters, which made the corporate cultures harder to meld than they might otherwise have been.

 

To his benefit, Mr. Levin is generally credited with having been prescient in building the company's stake in cable television. In 1995 he supplemented that effort through two major acquisitions: the $2.2 billion purchase of Cablevision Industries' 1.3 million subscribers, and the $2.3 billion acquisition of Houston Industries and its 700,000 subscribers. "He was right on cable values when everyone said that he was making a mistake and that the technology would become obsolete," said one media executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

 

Mr. Levin's move to acquire the Turner Broadcasting System in 1995 is also considered a shrewd one. Even though the $7.5 billion purchase diluted Time Warner's stock at the time, the underlying businesses were solid ones that included CNN, the TBS cable network and the Cartoon Network. Those businesses gave Time Warner even greater influence in the fast-growing cable programming sector.

 

And yet, the Turner merger, which made Ted Turner a Time Warner vice chairman and the company's biggest shareholder, also illustrated one of Mr. Levin's liabilities: managing relationships. Initially, Mr. Turner described himself as a fan of Mr. Levin. But people close to Mr. Turner say he came to feel excluded and powerless after the merger of AOL and Time Warner. Increasingly, Mr. Turner became known as a Levin adversary who criticized him to other board members and to other media executives.

 

The rift with Mr. Turner was not the only indication that Mr. Levin was more attuned to making deals than dealing with people.

 

There was well-publicized turmoil, for example, at the Warner Music division in the mid-1990's. After a series of managers left Warner Music, Mr. Levin handed it in 1995 to an executive with scant music experience, Michael Fuchs, the longtime head of the company's Home Box Office cable network. Within six months, he was forced out of the company, reportedly because the powerful executives then running the film division — Robert A. Daly and Terry Semel — wanted to add it to their portfolio.

 

Only after Mr. Daly and Mr. Semel themselves resigned in 1999, did Mr. Levin finally appoint a recording industry executive to run Warner Music: Roger Ames, the former president of Polygram Music. Under Mr. Ames, Warner Music has regained market share, but still lags well behind the industry leader, Universal.

 

Other parts of the business fared better in the 1990's. In 1998 Time Warner's stock rose 60 percent, reaching $63.125, largely on the strength of its cable business. And Mr. Levin was gradually paring the company's staggering debt.

 

But by late 1999, during the bull market, the company's growth was slowing and the stock was up only about 15 percent for the year — in unflattering contrast to the large run-ups by various Internet companies, including America Online, whose shares rose 96 percent that same year. Mr. Levin became hungry for the next big deal.

 

And yet, his keep-your-own-counsel management approach led him to conduct the AOL merger negotiations in the fall of 1999 without the guidance of many of his own top executives.

 

"The deal with AOL was announced on Monday morning, and we found out about it Sunday night," a top Time Warner executive recalled, remembering the merger announcement on Jan. 10, 2000. "How could you argue for a deal where you give up 55 percent of the company without consulting your other top managers? There was no give and take. There was no internal discussion."

 

It was little wonder that as chief executive of the combined AOL Time Warner, Mr. Levin had scant success making the two companies' disparate cultures work together. But that task now becomes the job of Mr. Parsons, an executive not known as a deal maker — but one with a reputation, at least, of knowing how to deal with people.

 

One person Mr. Parsons has tried to cultivate is the vice chairman, Mr. Turner.

 

Asked about Mr. Levin's legacy yesterday, Mr. Turner lunged for the last laugh. "I have no comment," he said, as he left the Apollo Theater. Then he paused and reconsidered. "No," Mr. Turner said. "We're going to miss him. Ha, ha, ha."

 

############## ######################################## ####################\\

 

Fitch Rates $1.07B CIT Equipment Collateral 2002-VT1

 

 

CHICAGO--Fitch Ratings has assigned the CIT Equipment Collateral 2002-VT1 (CITEC 2002-VT1) $288,500,000 class A-1 notes an 'F1+' rating. In addition, Fitch rates the $277,000,000 class A-2 notes 'AAA', $319,000,000 class A-3 notes 'AAA', $106,550,000 class A-4 notes 'AAA', $29,350,000 class B notes 'AA', $16,000,000 class C notes 'A' and $32,096,994 class D notes 'BBB'.

 

The class A ratings reflect credit enhancement provided by the subordination of the class B notes (2.75%), the class C notes (1.50%), the class D notes (3%) and the initial cash collateral account (8.25%). The class B rating reflects credit enhancement provided by the subordination of the class C notes, the class D notes, and the cash collateral account. The class C rating reflects credit enhancement provided by the subordination of the class D notes and the cash collateral account. The class D rating reflects credit enhancement provided by the cash collateral account. The ratings address the timely payment of interest and the ultimate payment of principal in accordance with the terms of the legal documents.

 

The underlying pool of contracts backing the CITEC 2002-VT1 notes consists of technology assets originated from the commercial small ticket and vendor programs of CIT's Specialty Finance segment. The initial contract principal balance is approximately $1.07 billion. The pool contains 73,864 contracts with major equipment types being computers, telecommunications and office equipment. In determining the required level of credit enhancement, Fitch took into consideration performance of CIT's past securitizations, as well as its total managed portfolio. Through this analysis, Fitch was able to isolate the historical performance of collateral types relevant to the CITEC 2002-VT1 transaction, while taking into account CIT's low level of annualized losses. In addition, Fitch considered the overall strength of CIT and its relationships with entities such as Dell Computer Corp. Ultimately, credit enhancement levels were sized to withstand multiples of historic losses at each rating level over the life of the transaction.

 

CIT Group Inc. is a leading diversified finance company engaging in vendor, equipment, commercial, consumer and structured financing, and leasing activities. CIT operates its businesses independently as a wholly owned subsidiary of Tyco International, Ltd.

 

CITEC 2002-VT1 is the fourth securitization of CIT's technology assets since its acquisition of Newcourt Credit Group, Inc. in November 1999.

 

CONTACT:

 

Fitch Ratings

 

Brigid Keyes, 312/606-2361 (Chicago)

 

John Bella, 312/368-2058 (Chicago)

 

Media Relations:

 

Matt Burkhard, 212/908-0540 (New York)

############## ##################################################

 

NAR President Testifies: Congress Must Act Now to Keep Banks Out of Real Estate

 

 

WASHINGTON--Testifying before the U.S. House Judiciary Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee, the president of the National Association of Realtors(R) said today that banking conglomerates are trying to gain through regulation that which they cannot gain through legislation in their overzealous attempt to get into real estate brokerage and property management.

 

NAR President Martin Edwards Jr., a partner in Colliers Wilkinson

 

Snowden Inc., Memphis, Tenn., called on Congress to take action on the Community Choice in Real Estate Act in light of the serious congressional concerns raised at today's hearing and the fact that a majority of the House has cosponsored this legislation that would prohibit the proposed rule from taking effect.

 

More than 230 members of the House and 11 Senators have signed onto H.R.3424 and S.1839 since the bills were introduced last December. Edwards said NAR will continue its campaign to stop the proposed rule, which is still pending before the Federal Reserve Board and Treasury Department, by pushing for the bill's enactment.

 

"Thousands of Realtors have been up on Capitol Hill visiting their congressional delegations all this week and they've been telling me one thing -- keep up the fight to keep banks out of real estate," Edwards said. "We call upon the banking lobby to face the music and comply with congressional intent and the public interest by ending its efforts to get into the real estate business."

 

"The bottom line is that bankers, who petitioned the Federal Reserve and Treasury for this proposed rule, should not gain through regulation what they failed to gain by legislation," he explained. "We believe that letting financial holding companies and national bank subsidiaries enter the real estate brokerage, leasing and property management industries would have wide-ranging, adverse market effects

 

-- including a decline in competition, consumer choices and quality of service.

 

"Last month, Treasury Secretary O'Neill postponed making a decision on this issue until next year. The ball is back in Congress' court, and Congress must act now to resolve this issue," Edwards testified.

 

"Realtors all across America applaud Congressman Barr for having the foresight and the fortitude to hold a hearing to look into what's going on over at Treasury with respect to the proposed rule, given the tremendous public and congressional opposition it has created. Congressman Barr and a majority of his House colleagues clearly understand that granting banking conglomerates permission to get into real estate would be detrimental to the national economy and to consumers," he said.

 

NAR opposes allowing large banking conglomerates to enter real estate brokerage and property management under the guise of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act because it will lead to higher costs to consumers, large scale consolidation in the real estate industry, and potential conflicts of interest should banks be able to steer homebuyers to their own insurance and loan products.

 

Other organizations that have voiced support for the Community Choice in Real Estate Act, introduced last December by Reps. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.) and Steven LaTourette (R-Ohio), include the Building Owners and Managers Association, CCIM Institute, Institute of Real Estate Management, International Council of Shopping Centers, National Affordable Housing Management Association, National Association of Home Builders, National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, National Auctioneers Association, National Fair Housing Alliance, National Leased Housing Association and the National Community Reinvestment Coalition.

 

The National Association of Realtors(R), "The Voice for Real Estate," is America's largest trade association, representing over 800,000 members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries. Information about NAR is available at http://www.realtor.org. This and other press releases are posted in the Web site's "News Release" section.

 

CONTACT:

 

National Association of Realtors

 

Linda M. Johnson, 202/383-7536

 

lmjohnson@realtors.org

############## ########################################################

 

Sunrise International Leasing Corporation Reports Strong First-Quarter 2002 Results

 

 

GOLDEN VALLEY, Minn / -- Sunrise International Leasing Corporation (SILC)  announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2002.

 

For the quarter, SILC recorded revenues of $35.9 million, compared to $50.8 million for the prior-year period, and net income of $2.7 million, versus $3.5 million for the comparable 2001 first quarter.

 

While revenues and net income decreased from the prior-year period, net income as a percent of revenues increased to 7.5 percent from 6.9 percent due to lower interest costs and lower provisions for losses.

 

The decline was expected given the record revenues and net income realized in 2001, which enabled SILC to score first in growth and second in productivity per employee in a recent survey of Minnesota's 100 largest private companies.  The company also reported a $42 million reduction in debt during the first quarter, and expects to be debt free on its current portfolio by the end of third quarter.

 

Outlook 

 

While current economic conditions, specifically in the high-technology marketplace, have reduced demand and increased competition, SILC expects to continue to generate substantial revenue, net income and free cash flow during 2002.  The company will benefit from reductions in interest costs as a result of the previously mentioned debt payoff.  Additionally, provisions for losses are expected to be lower due to an improvement in the credit quality of its portfolio.

 

SILC recently announced a vendor program affiliation with Sharp Electronics Corp., and is targeting other vendors that could benefit from SILC's expertise and sophisticated asset management system.

 

About Sunrise International Leasing Corp 

 

SILC's business consists primarily of the development of market-oriented vendor programs emphasizing the formulation of customized lease and rental programs for vendors of high technology and other equipment.  The lease options offered by the company generally focus on short-term, fair market value lease terms.  The company also has affiliations with other leasing companies and banks wherein it receives lease referrals from these institutions for transactions they do not accept for their own account.  SILC is also a competitive reseller of high quality used equipment.

 

About King Capital Corp 

 

SILC is a wholly owned subsidiary of privately held King Capital Corp. King Capital Corp, established in 1975 and based in Golden Valley, Minn., offers a wide range of leasing options to manufacturers, distributors and resellers through its primary subsidiary, SILC as well as high-availability software through H.A. Technical Solutions, LLC.

 

SUNRISE INTERNATIONAL LEASING CORPORATION 

 

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

Three Months Ended 

 

March 31, 

 

2002           2001

 

Revenues                                     $35,922,000    $50,826,000 

 

Cost and expenses                             30,818,000     44,435,000 

 

Income before provision for income taxes       5,104,000      6,391,000 

 

Provision for income taxes                     2,399,000      2,877,000 

 

Net Income                                    $2,705,000     $3,514,000

#################   ###############################################

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

U.S. Economy: Production Rises; Core Inflation Tame

 

Washington: U.S. industrial production rose in April for a fourth straight month, led by a jump in auto manufacturing. Vehicle discounts helped limit a rise in consumer prices, suggesting inflation doesn't threaten the economy's rebound.

 

Last month's 0.4 percent rise in production at factories, mines and utilities matched the March increase, the Federal Reserve said. Higher costs for gasoline, tobacco and food led a 0.5 percent jump in the April consumer price index, the Labor Department said. Excluding those goods, prices rose 0.2 percent.

 

Manufacturing ``is going to continue to accelerate because we're only partway through efforts to return inventories to normal levels'' after a record decline last year, said Jim Glassman, senior economist at J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. in New York. It will be some time before ``you start to worry about inflation pressures,'' he said.

 

Together the two reports reinforce investor expectations that Fed policy makers will put off raising interest rates until August, when they may have a clearer sign the recovery is

sustained. Fed officials have discounted energy price increases in recent comments and said they remain concerned about growth

 

 ( courtesy www.efj.com )

 

_________________________________________________________________

Dell Profit Exceeds Firm's Forecast

 

By Mike Musgrove

 

 

Washington Post Staff Writer

 

 

Dell Computer Corp. yesterday reported first- quarter earnings that were slightly better than expected and about equal to those a year earlier, crediting its business model rather than a rebound in the economy.

 

The Round Rock, Tex., computer maker reported a profit of $457 million (17 cents per share) on revenue of $8.1 billion. Those numbers were higher than the company's April 3 prediction, when Dell said revenue could reach $7.9 billion and earnings were expected to be 16 cents per share. The company earned $462 million (17 cents) in the first quarter of last year.

 

Dell has usually remained ahead of its competitors in good times and bad. Though rivals Hewlett-Packard Co. and Compaq Computer Corp. recently merged to become the No. 1 personal computer maker, Dell has boasted that it will reclaim the lead within two quarters. No. 3 PC maker Gateway Inc. has been losing market share and is expected by some analysts to lose money this year.

 

Kevin B. Rollins, Dell's chief operating officer, said stronger U.S. sales and cost-cutting measures had helped the company's performance in the first quarter, in which Dell reported an increase of 16 percent in shipments of servers, storage products and workstations.

 

"I don't think we're quite to the point where we're suggesting there's been a turnaround," he said, adding that he believes that "the year might have some pickup at the back end."

 

Roger Kay, director of client computing at research firm IDC, said Dell took advantage of falling component costs last year to undercut its competitors' prices. This year, he said, component costs have been stable and the company has instead focused on becoming more profitable.

 

"Dell is in such mighty control over its finances it can literally decide how profitable it wants to be," Kay said. "By not pricing as aggressively, it's not taking share as rapidly as it was but it can shore up the bottom line."

 

Dell is often the standard in the industry when analysts or tech firms point to a lean and mean business structure. Rollins said Dell aims to become even leaner this year, and should save $1 billion in cost reductions.

 

Dell raised its profit forecast for its second quarter yesterday to 18 cents per share on $8.2 billion in revenue, compared with analyst expectations of 17 cents a share and revenue of $8.0 billion. Dell's forecasted earnings would be 12.5 percent higher than it earned in the same period last year, and the revenue increase would be 8 percent.

 

Dell shares rose 15 cents, to $27.85, yesterday on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

 

 

 

 

 

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

############### #############################################

 

Comdisco Announces Fiscal Second Quarter and Six Month Financial Results

 

 

ROSEMONT, Ill--Comdisco, Inc., (OTC:CDSOQ)  reported operating results for its fiscal second quarter and six months ended March 31, 2002.

 

Operating Results: For the fiscal second quarter, Comdisco reported a loss from continuing operations of $94 million, or $.62 per common share, as compared with a loss from continuing operations of $11 million, or $.07 per common share, for the year earlier period. The decrease in fiscal 2002 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2001 was primarily the result of lower revenue. Total revenue for fiscal second quarter was $444 million, compared to $824 million for the prior year quarter. The decrease in total revenue in the current year compared to the year earlier period is due to lower revenues from the sale of equity securities in Comdisco Ventures' portfolio, and lower leasing and remarketing revenues, as the company continues the orderly sale or runoff of all its existing asset portfolios. In addition, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," the company recorded a pre-tax charge of $15 million, $9 million after-tax, or $.06 per common share, to reduce cost in excess of fair value to reflect the difference between carrying value and estimated proceeds from the sale of the company's healthcare assets. Comdisco announced the sale of most of its healthcare assets to GE Capital's Healthcare Financial Services unit for approximately $165 million, including the assumption of approximately $45 million in related secured debt, on April 4, 2002. Overall, the company had a net loss of $94 million, or $.62 per common share, as compared with a net loss of $54 million, or $.35 per common share, for the year earlier period.

 

For the six months ended March 31, 2002, Comdisco reported a loss from continuing operations of $310 million, or $2.06 per common share, as compared to earnings of $75 million, or $.49 per common share diluted, for the year earlier period. Net earnings from discontinued operations for the six months ended March 31, 2002 were $204 million, or $1.36 per common share, compared to a net loss of $43 million, or

 

$.28 per common share, for the year earlier period. Approximately $199 million, or $1.32 per common share, of the net earnings from discontinued operations for the current period relates to the gain on the sale of the company's Availability Solutions business to SunGard (NYSE-SDS) on November 15, 2001. The remaining $5 million of net earnings, or $.04 per common share, from discontinued operations for the current period relates to net earnings from Availability Solutions prior to the sale.

 

Overall, the company had a net loss of $106 million, or $.70 per share, compared to net earnings of $34 million, or $.22 per common share diluted, for the year earlier period. Total revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2002 was $940 million, versus $1.6 billion, for the prior year period. Included in the six-month net loss for fiscal 2002, are pre-tax charges of $265 million, $198 million after-tax, or $1.31 per common share, to reduce cost in excess of fair value to reflect the difference between carrying value and estimated proceeds from the sale of the company's Electronics, Laboratory and Scientific and Healthcare assets.

 

Plan of Reorganization Filed: On April 26, 2002, Comdisco announced that it filed a proposed Joint Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The Plan contemplates a Reorganized Comdisco that will have three operating subsidiaries and continue to operate in the orderly sale or run off of all its existing asset portfolios, which is expected to take up to three years to complete.

 

The Plan and the Disclosure Statement were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with a form 8-K filing on May 13, 2002, and will be mailed to all creditors and stockholders entitled to vote on the Plan after the Bankruptcy Court approves the Disclosure Statement and authorizes the company to commence solicitation of votes. A hearing on the Disclosure Statement is scheduled for May 31, 2002 and a Confirmation Hearing on the Plan is scheduled for July 30, 2002.

 

Comdisco's operations located outside of the United States were not included in the Chapter 11 reorganization cases. All of Comdisco's businesses, including those that filed for Chapter 11, are conducting normal operations. The company has targeted emergence from Chapter 11 during the late summer of 2002.

 

About Comdisco

 

Comdisco (www.comdisco.com) provides technology services to help its customers maximize technology functionality and predictability, while freeing them from the complexity of managing their technology. The Rosemont (IL) company offers information technology and telecommunications leasing to a broad range of customers. Through its Ventures division, Comdisco provides equipment leasing and other financing and services to venture capital backed companies.

 

*T Comdisco, Inc.

 

Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss)  For the Three and Six Months March 31, 2002 and 2001  (dollars in millions except per share data)

 

Three Months Ended            

 

March 31,              %  

 

2002          2001        +/- 

 

-------       -------        ---- Revenue

 

Leasing

 

Operating                      $   278       $   389        -29%

 

Direct financing                    28            45        -38%

 

Sales-type                          13            45        -71%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Total leasing                    319           479        -33%

 

Equipment sales                     81           104        -22%

 

Technology services                 25            42        -40%

 

Other                               19           199        -90%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Total revenue                    444           824        -46%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Costs and expenses

 

Leasing

 

Operating                          221           306        -28%

 

Sales-type                          12            26        -54%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Total leasing                    233           332        -30%

 

Equipment sales                       84            77          9%    Technology services                   15            40        -63%    Selling, general and administrative   73            75         -3%    Write-down of equity securities       10            21        -52%    Bad debt expense:

 

Leasing                             15             9         67%

 

Ventures                            57           185        -69%    Reorganization items:

 

Estimated loss on sale of

 

leased assets                      15             -        N/A 

 

Other                                9             -        N/A 

 

Interest                              20           102        -80%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Total costs and expenses           531           841        -37%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing  operations before income taxes

 

(benefit) and cumulative effect  of change in accounting principle     (87)          (17)       412%  Income taxes (benefit)                   7            (6)      -217%

 

-------       -------        ---- Earnings (loss) from continuing  operations before cumulative  effect of change in accounting  principle                             (94)          (11)       755%  Earnings (loss) from discontinued  operations, net of tax                  -           (43)      -100%

 

-------       -------        ---- Earnings (loss) before cumulative  effect of change in accounting  principle                             (94)          (54)        74%  Cumulative effect of change in  accounting principle, net of tax        -             -        N/A 

 

-------       -------        ---- Net earnings (loss) to common  stockholders                      $   (94)      $   (54)        74%

 

Retained earnings at beginning  of period                         $   760       $ 1,135            

 

Net earnings (loss) to common  stockholders                          (94)          (54)             Cash dividends paid on common stock      -            (3)           

 

-------       -------             Retained earnings at end of period $   666       $ 1,078            

 

Basic earnings (loss) per  common share:

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing

 

operations                    $ (0.62)      $ (0.07)       786% 

 

Net earnings (loss) from

 

discontinued operations             -         (0.28)           

 

Cumulative effect of change

 

in accounting principle             -             -            

 

-------       -------           

 

Net earnings (loss)            $ (0.62)      $ (0.35)           

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per  common share:

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing

 

operations                    $ (0.62)      $ (0.07)       786% 

 

Net earnings (loss) from

 

discontinued operations             -         (0.28)           

 

Cumulative effect of change in

 

accounting principle                -             -            

 

-------       -------           

 

Net earnings (loss)            $ (0.62)      $ (0.35)           

 

Common shares outstanding:

 

Average common shares

 

outstanding--basic                151           152            

 

Average common shares

 

outstanding--diluted              151           152            

 

Six Months Ended

 

March 31,              %

 

2002          2001        +/-

 

-------       -------        ---- Revenue

 

Leasing

 

Operating                      $   595       $   780        -24%

 

Direct financing                    62            91        -32%

 

Sales-type                          23            87        -74%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Total leasing                    680           958        -29%

 

Equipment sales                    179           176          2%

 

Technology services                 49            83        -41%

 

Other                               32           396        -92%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Total revenue                    940         1,613        -42%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Costs and expenses

 

Leasing

 

Operating                          477           615        -22%

 

Sales-type                          20            52        -62%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Total leasing                    497           667        -25%

 

Equipment sales                      166           126         32%   Technology services                   31            77        -60%   Selling, general and administrative  135           165        -18%   Write-down of equity securities       43            33         30%   Bad debt expense:

 

Leasing                              8            13        -38%

 

Ventures                           102           211        -52%   Reorganization items:

 

Estimated loss on sale of

 

leased assets                     265             -        N/A

 

Other                               26             -        N/A

 

Interest                              40           204        -80%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Total costs and expenses         1,313         1,496        -12%

 

-------       -------        ----

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing  operations before income taxes

 

(benefit) and cumulative effect  of change in accounting principle    (373)          117       -419% Income taxes (benefit)                 (63)           42       -250%

 

-------       -------        ---- Earnings (loss) from continuing  operations before cumulative  effect of change in accounting  principle                            (310)           75       -513% Earnings (loss) from discontinued  operations, net of tax                204           (43)      -574%

 

-------       -------        ---- Earnings (loss) before cumulative  effect of change in accounting  principle                            (106)           32       -431% Cumulative effect of change in  accounting principle, net of tax        -             2       -100%

 

-------       -------        ---- Net earnings (loss) to common  stockholders                      $  (106)      $    34       -412%

 

Retained earnings at beginning  of period                         $   772       $ 1,051

 

Net earnings (loss) to common  stockholders                         (106)           34 Cash dividends paid on common stock      -            (7)

 

-------       -------         Retained earnings at end of period $   666       $ 1,078

 

Basic earnings (loss) per  common share:

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing

 

operations                    $ (2.06)      $  0.50       -512%

 

Net earnings (loss) from

 

discontinued operations          1.36         (0.29)

 

Cumulative effect of change

 

in accounting principle             -          0.01

 

-------       -------             

 

Net earnings (loss)            $ (0.70)      $  0.22

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per  common share:

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing

 

operations                    $ (2.06)      $  0.49       -520%

 

Net earnings (loss) from

 

discontinued operations          1.36         (0.28)

 

Cumulative effect of change in

 

accounting principle                -          0.01

 

-------       -------           

 

Net earnings (loss)            $ (0.70)      $  0.22

 

Common shares outstanding:

 

Average common shares

 

outstanding--basic                151           152

 

Average common shares

 

outstanding--diluted              151           156

 

Comdisco, Inc.

 

Revenue and Earnings (Losses) Breakdown

 

By Lines of Business

 

Below are the results by lines of business for the three and six months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 (dollars in millions):

 

Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended

 

3/31/02        3/31/01     3/31/02      3/31/01

 

-----------------------     -------------------- Revenue

 

Leasing              $  339         $  510      $  732      $ 1,002

 

Technology services      25             42          49           83

 

Ventures                 80            272         159          528

 

-----------------------     --------------------

 

Total                $  444         $  824      $  940      $ 1,613

 

Pretax Earnings (Loss)  from continuing  operations

 

Leasing              $  (10)        $   11      $   33      $    31

 

Technology services      10              2          18            6

 

Ventures                (63)           (30)       (133)          80

 

Reorganization items    (24)             -        (291)           -

 

-----------------------     --------------------

 

Total                $  (87)        $  (17)     $ (373)     $   117

 

Comdisco, Inc.

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

March 31, 2002 and September 30, 2001

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

March 31,  September 30,

 

2002         2001

 

----------- ------------ ASSETS

 

Cash and cash equivalents                       $  2,032    $     543 Cash - legally restricted                            174           54 Receivables, net                                     587          587 Inventory of equipment                                99           95 Net leased assets                                  2,138        4,003 Property, plant and equipment, net                    55           60 Equity securities                                     99          138 Net assets of discontinued  operation held for sale                               4          433 Other assets                                         149          215

 

----------- ------------

 

$  5,337    $   6,128

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

Liabilities not subject to compromise Secured: Term notes payable                              $    182    $     360 Discounted lease rentals                             447          964 Unsecured: Notes payable                                        133          179 Accounts payable                                      71          110 Income taxes                                         103           35 Deferred income                                       77          159 Other liabilities                                    308          191

 

----------- ------------

 

1,321        1,998

 

Liabilities subject to compromise Unsecured: Notes payable                                        917          917 Senior debt                                        2,639        2,639 Accounts payable                                      20           19 Other liabilities                                    108          108

 

----------- ------------

 

3,684        3,683

 

----------- ------------

 

5,005        5,681

 

----------- ------------ Stockholders'  equity:  Common stock                                         23           23  Additional paid-in capital                          365          365  Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)      (102)         (93)  Retained earnings                                   666          772

 

----------- ------------

 

952        1,067 Common stock held in treasury, at cost              (620)        (620)

 

----------- ------------ Total stockholders'equity                            332          447

 

----------- ------------

 

$  5,337    $   6,128

 

Comdisco, Inc.

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001

 

(in millions)

 

2002        2001

 

(Unaudited) (Unaudited)

 

----------- ------------

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents:

 

Cash flows from operating activities:  Leasing                                      $      973  $     1,068  Technology services                                  18           18  Ventures                                            332          713

 

----------- ------------  Cash flows from continuing operations             1,323        1,799  Prism                                                 -          (60)  Availability Solutions and Network Services         879           78

 

----------- ------------  Net cash provided by operating activities         2,202        1,817

 

----------- ------------

 

Cash flows from investing activities:  Leasing                                            (190)        (675)  Ventures                                            (17)        (392)

 

----------- ------------  Cash flows from continuing operations              (207)      (1,067)  Prism                                                 -            5  Availability Solutions and Network Services          (4)        (108)

 

----------- ------------

 

Net cash used in investing activities              (211)      (1,170)

 

----------- ------------

 

----------- ------------  Net cash used in financing activities              (502)        (495)

 

----------- ------------ Net increase in cash and cash equivalents          1,489          152 Cash and cash equivalents  at beginning of period                              543          315

 

----------- ------------ Cash and cash equivalents at end of period    $    2,032  $       467

 

*T

 

CONTACT:

 

Comdisco

 

Mary Moster, 847/518-5147

 

mcmoster@comdisco.com

################# ##########################################

 

 

             

 

To reach Leasing News, please e-mail kitmenkin@leasingnews.org or use the

contact form at www.leasingnews.org   Fax messages are often difficult to read.

Telephone calls result in “telephone tag” and often take longer to respond due

to time differences and limited time.  E-mail is always best.

 

Leasing News is sent ONLY to people who have requested it.  We do not Spam.

You register using our website www.leasingnews.org or contacting 

kitmenkin@leasingnews.org. . Our subscriber list is NOT made available to

the third parties. Subscription and Removal Assistance can

be accessed through out contact site at www.leasingnews.org or you may

directly contact kitmenkin@leaisngnes.org with you name as you registered it

along with you-mail address ( our list is kept by the name registered, not

by company or e-mail address. We have great difficulty in finding your

e-mail address without your name. If you have signed up and are not

receiving Leasing News, your carrier may be blocking the "mass mail".  You

may notify your carrier or send an  e-mail to us for verification, if

needed.  Online version of this publication is at

http://www.leasingnews.org.

 

Policy Statement

 

Policy Statement---Nothing is sent out that is not "fair." Always unbiased

reporting. Fairness always. If it is questionable, we will ask the writer's

permission to quote them. We will print information without attribution, but

feel as long as we do not name the person who sent it, we can use the

information. Any information we think is suspicious, we try to have if

substantiated first by at least two reliable people. We will not purposely

send out "negative" news. We prefer

"positive" news. We have no "axe" to grind or are not paid or seek or accept

any remuneration for product or promotion. We do not Spam anyone. To be

added to the mailing list, you must request it. We do not send anything

about our company or personal e-mail or jokes to the leasing news list. We

do not share our mailing list with anyone. We try not to send more than one

report a day, if at that, unless an "alert." We follow Internet

Netiquette at all times. Our sole purpose is to provide communication to

improve our profession. We reserve the right to deny sending the newsletter

when requested. We reserve the right to edit or delete an opinion that is

not in good taste or is outright derogatory.

Leasingnews.org

 


Virus Info Center
 
Top Stories


www.leasingnews.org
Leasing News, Inc.
346 Mathew Street,
Santa Clara,
California 95050
Voice: 408-727-7477 Fax: 800-727-3851
kitmenkin@leasingnews.org